Truth Does NOT Depend On Belief!

Author: Brad  |  Category: Boardman Views, Business Network, Conservatism, Education, Faith, Family, General, Global Warming Scam, Politics

The problem with scams is that the stench they create eventually grows to the point where it can no longer be ignored!  Folks start wondering, “Hey, what gives here?  I might have been born yesterday, but it was fairly early in the morning.”

Published: Sunday, November 1, 2009

Global warming? Are Australians, Czechs and other nations more skeptical (and smarter) than Americans?

By Kimberley Strassel
Wall Street Journal/Potomac Watch

Steve Fielding recently asked the Obama administration to reassure him on the science of man-made global warming. When the administration proved unhelpful, Mr. Fielding decided to vote against climate-change legislation.

If you haven’t heard of this politician, it’s because he’s a member of the Australian Senate. As the U.S. House of Representatives prepares to pass a climate-change bill, the Australian Parliament is preparing to kill its own country’s carbon-emissions scheme. Why? A growing number of Australian politicians, scientists and citizens once again doubt the science of human-caused global warming.

Among the many reasons President Barack Obama and the Democratic majority are so intent on quickly jamming a cap-and-trade system through Congress is because the global warming tide is again shifting. It turns out Al Gore and the United Nations (with an assist from the media), did a little too vociferous a job smearing anyone who disagreed with them as “deniers.” The backlash has brought the scientific debate roaring back to life in Australia, Europe, Japan and even, if less reported, the U.S.

In April, the Polish Academy of Sciences published a document challenging man-made global warming. In the Czech Republic, where President Vaclav Klaus remains a leading skeptic, today only 11% of the population believes humans play a role.

In France, President Nicolas Sarkozy wants to tap Claude Allegre to lead the country’s new ministry of industry and innovation. Twenty years ago Mr. Allegre was among the first to trill about man-made global warming, but the geochemist has since recanted.

New Zealand last year elected a new government, which immediately suspended the country’s weeks-old cap-and-trade program.

The number of skeptics, far from shrinking, is swelling. Oklahoma Sen. Jim Inhofe now counts more than 700 scientists who disagree with the U.N. — 13 times the number who authored the U.N.’s 2007 climate summary for policy makers.

Joanne Simpson, the world’s first woman to receive a Ph.D. in meteorology, expressed relief upon her retirement last year that she was finally free to speak “frankly” of her nonbelief. Dr. Kiminori Itoh, a Japanese environmental physical chemist who contributed to a U.N. climate report, dubs man-made warming “the worst scientific scandal in history.”

Norway’s Ivar Giaever, Nobel Prize winner for physics, decries it as the “new religion.” A group of 54 noted physicists, led by Princeton’s Will Happer, is demanding the American Physical Society revise its position that the science is settled. (Both Nature and Science magazines have refused to run the physicists’ open letter.)

The collapse of the “consensus” has been driven by reality. The inconvenient truth is that the earth’s temperatures have flat-lined since 2001, despite growing concentrations of C02. Peer-reviewed research has debunked doomsday scenarios about the polar ice caps, hurricanes, malaria, extinctions, rising oceans. A global financial crisis has politicians taking a harder look at the science that would require them to hamstring their economies to rein in carbon.

Credit for Australia’s own era of renewed enlightenment goes to Dr. Ian Plimer, a well-known Australian geologist. Earlier this year he published “Heaven and Earth,” a damning critique of the “evidence” underpinning man-made global warming. The book is already in its fifth printing. So compelling is it that Paul Sheehan, a noted Australian columnist — and ardent global warming believer — in April humbly pronounced it “an evidence-based attack on conformity and orthodoxy, including my own, and a reminder to respect informed dissent and beware of ideology subverting evidence.” Australian polls have shown a sharp uptick in public skepticism; the press is back to questioning scientific dogma; blogs are having a field day.

The rise in skepticism also came as Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, elected like Mr. Obama on promises to combat global warming, was attempting his own emissions-reduction scheme. His administration was forced to delay the implementation of the program until at least 2011, just to get the legislation through Australia’s House. The Senate was not so easily swayed.

Mr. Fielding, a crucial vote on the bill, was so alarmed by the renewed science debate that he made a fact-finding trip to the U.S., attending the Heartland Institute’s annual conference for climate skeptics. He also visited with Joseph Aldy, Mr. Obama’s special assistant on energy and the environment, where he challenged the Obama team to address his doubts. They apparently didn’t.

This week Mr. Fielding issued a statement: He would not be voting for the bill. He would not risk job losses on “unconvincing green science.” The bill is set to founder as the Australian parliament breaks for the winter.

Republicans in the U.S. have, in recent years, turned ever more to the cost arguments against climate legislation. That’s made sense in light of the economic crisis. If Speaker Nancy Pelosi fails to push through her bill, it will be because rural and Blue Dog Democrats fret about the economic ramifications.

Yet if the rest of the world is any indication, now might be the time for U.S. politicians to re-engage on the science. One thing for sure: They won’t be alone.

Remember, Truth is not dependent upon whether we believe it. The Truth will always be just that, even if you refuse to believe it.  Let the games continue and may Truth prevail!

You’re in Boardman Country!

Make yourself at home,

Brad


Be Sociable, Share!

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

6 Responses to “Truth Does NOT Depend On Belief!”

  1. Linda Says:

    Hi Brad,

    I understand Steve’s concern but the sun delivers
    our planet almost all of its energy, and an increase in total solar irradiance of just a few percent would have a profound effect on Earth’s temperatures. Likewise, a large increase in the concentration of carbon dioxide and other GHG (methane, nitrous oxide, CFCs etc.) would, on the basis of fundamental physics, be expected to invoke a serious planetary warming event.

    So, let’s look at the problem in the simplest possible terms:

    1. The Earth’s temperature is rising.

    2. Solar activity and GHG both force the climate system.

    3. There is no trend in solar activity.

    4. There is an upwards trend in greenhouse gas concentration.

    Then there is the summit in Copenhagen. Lets see what they have to say as well. 🙂

  2. admin Says:

    Thanks Linda.

    Not being the scientist that you are, I don’t pretend to understand all that you just said, but I appreciate you saying it for those who do.

    Meanwhile, I will be happy to wait for Copenhagen. I hope they’ll let Plimer in and that all in attendance will keep their hands in their pockets instead of over their ears.

  3. Linda Says:

    From another Linda: I never could understand why so many people, like sheep, were willing to follow Al Gore on this. He always blows the way the wind blows, so it is with healthy skepticism that his current beliefs are considered in this camp. He was pro-life when it was expedient, and pro “choice” (death) when he realized he couldn’t get the Dems to vote for him with that philosophy.

    So, instead of standing on conviction, he, like the chameleon, changes his colors to enhance his career. The “scientists” who espouse this doctrine are pop-scientists who stand to gain by jumping on the speeding train. There are financial rewards to be made. Ian Plimer exposed them for what they are.

  4. admin Says:

    @ Another Linda – Thanks for coming by and commenting! Nice to know there are “other” Lindas out there! 🙂

  5. Ron Says:

    Brad
    Good to see these opinions. I agree with Linda # 2. Al Blows which ever direction it helps him. This one seems to be blowing back in his face though. That is the way “politicians” are. Heck they need to keep their career. Very few want common sense to
    enter in a debate. That is why legislation seems to have to be voted on so quickly now a days.
    Now I feel better.LOL
    Thanks

  6. www.allaboutalternatives.com Says:

    Brad
    Good article. All of these gov. programs now are all and only about people control.(have been for several decades, it just upscaled now) They are running out of time that the public is so stupid to believe their scams. Cap and tax, health care. D.C. could not care any less about your and my health. The less care the better,is their thinking.
    Signed up for your SoKule the other day, I need to spend time there and get it working for me.
    Thanks
    Smokey and I

Email
Print